{"id":632,"date":"2017-10-12T21:39:42","date_gmt":"2017-10-12T21:39:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/?post_type=ht_kb&#038;p=632"},"modified":"2024-05-31T15:50:27","modified_gmt":"2024-05-31T15:50:27","slug":"bridge-scour-evauluation","status":"publish","type":"ht_kb","link":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/knowledge-base\/bridge-scour-evauluation\/","title":{"rendered":"Bridge Scour Evauluation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Channel Studio utilizes the computational techniques outlined in Hydrologic Engineering Circular No. 18, (HEC-18) to conduct scour calculations. Once the water surface calculations are completed, the software automatically computes the scour if the Scour input for D50 has been provided. No additional input is required from the user.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><!-- x-tinymce\/html --><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-343\" src=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/ScourSectionDiagram.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"750\" height=\"328\" srcset=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/ScourSectionDiagram.png 750w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/ScourSectionDiagram-300x131.png 300w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/ScourSectionDiagram-50x22.png 50w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/ScourSectionDiagram-60x26.png 60w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/ScourSectionDiagram-100x44.png 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px\" \/>The software computes two types of scour:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Contraction<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong> Pier<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Both are described below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Contraction Scour<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Contraction scour is evaluated using two basic equations:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Live-bed<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong> Clear-water<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Live-bed contraction scour happens when bed material is moved from the upstream approach section to the bridge cross section. During live-bed scour, the contracted section under the bridge expands until the sediment transported out matches the sediment brought in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Clear-water contraction scour can happen in two scenarios. The first scenario is when there is no movement of bed material from the upstream reach to the downstream reach. The second scenario is when the material being transported in the approach section is carried through the bridge section in suspension.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If there is a flow of bed material in the approach section upstream of the bridge, it is considered as live-bed flow, and the Live-bed equation is applied. On the other hand, if there is no transportation of bed material, it is referred to as clear-water flow, and the corresponding equation is used. To ascertain the prevailing condition, it is necessary to calculate the critical velocity, which is the velocity at which bed material starts to transport.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Critical Velocity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Critical Velocity is computed using the following equation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-style-default\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"185\" height=\"66\" src=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourVc.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-563\" srcset=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourVc.png 185w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourVc-50x18.png 50w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourVc-60x21.png 60w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourVc-100x36.png 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 185px) 100vw, 185px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Vc = Critical velocity in ft\/s (m\/s)<br>Ku = 11.17 English (6.19 SI)<br>y = Average depth of flow upstream of the bridge, ft. (m)<br>D = D50 in ft. (m)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If Critical velocity is greater than or equal to the Average velocity in the upstream approach section, the Clear-water equation is applied. Otherwise, the Live-bed equation is utilized. Our observations indicate that the Live-bed equation typically results in greater scour compared to the Clear-water equation, with no discernible transition zone. Consequently, minor adjustments in D may lead to significant variations in scour depths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Live-bed Equation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The Live-bed equation is utilized as needed for each sub-area, i.e., the Left overbank, Main channel and Right overbank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-style-default\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"236\" height=\"102\" src=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourLiveBed.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourLiveBed.png 236w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourLiveBed-50x22.png 50w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourLiveBed-60x26.png 60w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourLiveBed-100x43.png 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 236px) 100vw, 236px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>y2 = Average depth in the contracted Bridge section after scour, ft (m)<br>y1 = Average depth in the upstream approach section, ft (m)<br>Q1 = Flow in the upstream approach section transporting sediment, cfs (cms)<br>Q2 = Flow in the bridge section, cfs (cms)<br>W1 = Bottom width of the approach section that is transporting bed material, ft (m)<br>W2 = Bottom width of bridge section less pier width(s), ft (m)<br>k1 = Exponent based on the Fall Velocity of the bed material, D50. Can be 0.59, 0.64 or 0.69<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Clear-water Equation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The Clear-water equation is utilized as needed for each sub-area, i.e., the Left overbank, Main channel and Right overbank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-style-default\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"214\" height=\"104\" src=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourClearWater.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-559\" srcset=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourClearWater.png 214w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourClearWater-50x24.png 50w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourClearWater-60x29.png 60w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourClearWater-100x49.png 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 214px) 100vw, 214px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>y2 = Average depth in the contracted Bridge section after scour, ft (m)<br>Q2 = Flow in the bridge section, cfs (cms)<br>W2 = Bottom width of bridge section less pier width(s), ft (m)<br>C = 130 for English and 40 for SI units<br>Dm = 1.25 x D50<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Scour Depth<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The actual scour depth, ys, is computed as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-style-default\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"140\" height=\"49\" src=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourDepth.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-560\" srcset=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourDepth.png 140w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourDepth-50x18.png 50w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourDepth-60x21.png 60w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourDepth-100x35.png 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 140px) 100vw, 140px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ys = Average depth of scour in ft (m)<br>yo = Average depth under the bridge (area of flow \/ top-width) before scour in ft (m)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The bottom widths of sections (W) are approximated by using the computed water surface top widths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Pressure Flow Scour<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>When the water surface at the upstream end of the bridge deck is above the low chord of the deck, pressure flow exists. In these cases a distance, t (separation zone thickness), is added to the computed scour. The distance t is measured from the low chord elevation to the water surface at the downstream end of the deck.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Pier Scour<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-style-default\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"585\" height=\"330\" src=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/PierScourDiag.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-345\" srcset=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/PierScourDiag.png 585w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/PierScourDiag-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/PierScourDiag-50x28.png 50w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/PierScourDiag-60x34.png 60w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/PierScourDiag-100x56.png 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 585px) 100vw, 585px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Channel Studio uses an equation developed by Dr. David Froehlich, 1991 for computing local pier scour. This equation is used in lieu of the HEC-18 Colorado State University equation due to its simplicity. This equation is also used as an alternate in HEC-RAS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-style-default\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"356\" height=\"66\" src=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourPier.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-562\" srcset=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourPier.png 356w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourPier-300x56.png 300w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourPier-50x9.png 50w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourPier-60x11.png 60w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqScourPier-100x19.png 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 356px) 100vw, 356px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d8 = Correction factor for pier nose shape &#8211; 1.0 rounded; 1.3 square; 0.7 triangular<br>a = Projected pier width with respect to the direction of flow<br>Fr = Froude number<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-style-default\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"130\" height=\"84\" src=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqFroude.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-552\" srcset=\"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqFroude.png 130w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqFroude-50x32.png 50w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqFroude-60x39.png 60w, https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/EqFroude-100x65.png 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 130px) 100vw, 130px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V = Average velocity across the bridge section at the upstream side<br>y1 = Average depth of flow just upstream of the individual pier<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It should be noted that the additional + a (one pier width) at the end of this equation is simply a factor of safety recommended by Froehlich when designing. Channel Studio does not include this in its calculations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Pier Scour width is equal to 2 x Ys, to each side of the pier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Pier Scour Limits<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>If the Froude Number, Fr, is &lt;= 0.8 then the maximum pier scour depth is 2.4 x Pier Width. If greater than 0.8 the maximum pier scour width is 3 x Pier Width.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Contraction and pier scour explained in detail<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"ht-kb-category":[41],"ht-kb-tag":[],"class_list":["post-632","ht_kb","type-ht_kb","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","ht_kb_category-bridges"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ht_kb"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=632"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/632\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1917,"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/632\/revisions\/1917"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-category?post=632"},{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/learn.hydrologystudio.com\/channel-studio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-tag?post=632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}